Introduction to integrated methods in the vegetable garden
chapter crop sol
To plow or not to plow?
Click on ♦ to go to a page in the chapter
Analysis of the physico-chemical properties of cultivated soils ♦
. Texture and structure of cultivated soils ♦
. Clay-humus complexes and cation exchange capacity ♦
. Other interesting data that may be included in a laboratory analysis ♦
Influence of pH on the fertility potential of cultivated soils ♦
Humus; formation and evolution ♦
Soil fertility: is the apocalypse coming tomorrow? ♦
The microbial world and soil fertility ♦
Rhizosphere, mychorizae and suppressive soils ♦
Correction of soils that are very clayey, too calcareous or too sandy ♦
Stimation of humus losses in cultivated soil ♦
Compost production for a vegetable garden ♦
Composting with thermophilic phase ♦
Weed management in the vegetable garden ♦
⇒ To plow or not to plow?
The rotary tiller, the spade fork, and the broadfork ♦
Please share this website with your friends and family and anyone else who might be interested in integrated farming methods.
Soil cultivation was immediately adopted when Neolithic man turned to agriculture more than 5,000 years ago. On every continent, early farmers found that tilling the soil promoted seed germination and plant growth. In Europe, soil cultivation was initially carried out using rudimentary tools such as the adze, which was used as a hoe. Before the Gallo-Roman era, the Celts were already using the araire, which splits the earth using a ploughshare but does not turn it over.
Ploughing involves turning over the soil using a spade for small areas or a plough for large crops. When ploughing, the garden soil is not mixed. Everything on the surface of the soil, such as weeds, is buried 25 to 30 cm deep. In large-scale farming, mechanisation has led to deeper ploughing, which can reach depths of up to 80 cm.

Excerpt from the film: The Guardians
The plough and ploughing have been known since at least the 5th century (1). However, ploughing did not become widespread overnight. The ard was still used in France by some farmers on the eve of pre-industrial agriculture. This tool is mentioned in a very famous 19th-century book written by Félicien PARISET (2), which states that the soil is loosened to a depth of 10 to 12 cm three times a year for wheat cultivation, without any concern for the consequences on earthworms.
With few exceptions, the use of these various soil cultivation techniques over thousands of years has never led to the desertification of cultivated land in France. Yet this is precisely what soil cultivation, and ploughing in particular, is criticised for today. However, the plagioclastic anthrosols of north-western Europe (or anthroposols in the French soil classification system), which support demanding crops where ploughing is frequently used, are characterised by a gradual accumulation over several thousand years of organic matter from agricultural activities mixed with the original soil. But these same regions have been suffering from humus loss in recent years, and it is of course useful to know the reasons for this.
Is ploughing really responsible for this situation? Isn’t it rather the result of the widespread adoption of intensive monoculture and the disappearance of mixed farming and the organic inputs provided by these farms? Is ploughing too deep? Or is it also due to the widespread use of sewerage systems, which prohibit the spreading of human excrement on fields for both health and comfort reasons? Or is it due to specific local conditions? For example, in the United States, more than a third of the Corn Belt in the Midwest has lost its carbon-rich topsoil. However, this loss has mainly been observed on hilltops and ridges, indicating erosion caused by tillage, with soil being displaced downhill by repeated ploughing (3).
The organic matter content of the soil depends mainly on the amount of crop residues returned to the field. Crushed maize residues return a significant amount of straw to the soil. It is recognised that successive crops with little cereal content, such as tubers, beetroot, lettuce, onions, etc., contribute little organic matter to the soil. As a result, there has been a decline in OM in regions such as northern France, where large quantities of potatoes are produced.
To address humus loss in intensive agriculture, other techniques comparable to the plough, or even no-till farming, are proposed as alternatives to ploughing. In “Simplified Cultivation Techniques” (SCT) or “No-Till Cultivation Techniques” (NCT), ploughing is replaced by shallow tillage without turning the soil, as practised by our ancestors with the plough. In “Soil Conservation Agriculture” (SCA), and particularly in direct sowing, the soil is no longer worked except along the sowing line to bury the seeds. The uncultivated part of the soil is covered with non-productive vegetation intended to maintain humus.
Maintaining humus with cover crops
In order to compensate for humus losses, specific non-productive plants are grown between the rows of the exportable crop, or after harvesting, so that the soil is never bare. The nature of this plant cover is defined in such a way as to create complementary relationships between the different plants, including weeds.
Farmers who specialise in this type of cultivation have learned to adjust the composition of the cover crops each year, taking into account the nature and sowing dates of the exportable crops, the vegetative cycle and the depth of the plant species (6).
For example, wheat is sown in November on a cover crop of lotus, a perennial herbaceous plant commonly grown as fodder. The lotus starts growing in May when the wheat is already tall, ensuring ground cover after the harvest. This combination has not shown any harmful competition with the export crop.
It is essential to choose a variety of cover crop that significantly improves soil fertility and helps reduce inputs. For example, in the United States, extensive research has been conducted by Mississippi State University to develop clover varieties with improved performance characteristics.
Varieties deliberately selected for later maturity showed a significant advantage in increasing soil nitrogen reserves. Thus, when examining 13 different varieties, the latest clover fixed 208 kg of nitrogen per hectare, while a less efficient variety fixed only 46 kg of nitrogen per hectare (7).
In direct sowing, the topsoil is maintained by beneficial organisms, particularly earthworms, which replace the work of spades or ploughs.
Direct sowing has developed mainly in Brazil, Argentina, the USA and Australia, often in specific soil and climate conditions with a different farming context to that in Europe.
For example, in Argentina, direct sowing of GM soybeans + glyphosate (18 million hectares in 2010 (4)) has seen spectacular growth. In France, direct sowing remains marginalised (between 0.5% and 4% in 2013, depending on the type of crop (5)).
ACS requires leaving a lot of plant debris on site. When the field is not used for exportable crops, plants are grown (known as cover crops) and then destroyed on site, usually using a weedkiller, to increase the humus reserve.
EApart from mites, crustaceans and other creatures that feed on this plant debris, direct sowing requires a large number of earthworms, which play a fundamental role in structuring arable land, particularly in aerating it and mixing organic matter with other soil elements to produce C.A.H.
The 3 main groups of earthworms

Black anecic (black head). Origin: author’s vegetable garden
The anecics
They are large and feed on the surface litter which they mix with the soil. These earthworms live in vertical tunnels underground to reach the surface and find their food. They release part of their excrement on the surface of the soil to form mounds, also known as « tortillons » in french. These earthworms live for several years in the soil, but their reproduction rate is limited. Anecic worms need compacted soil to build their galleries, which are destroyed after tillage resulting in a significant reduction in the surface area of the worm mounds.

Endogeics
Lightly pigmented and pale pink in colour, they live permanently in the soil by digging horizontal galleries and feeding on organic debris in the soil. Their droppings are left in the galleries.

Epigeics
They are small and often well coloured and prefer the surface litter of forests and meadows. Their reproduction rate is quite high. They are also found in abundance in composts.
The work done by certain species of earthworms on the soil is not insignificant. In temperate regions, there can be up to 15 species, some of which are considered to be soil tillers. Soil rich in organic matter can contain between 100 and 500 individuals per square metre. As an indication, density can reach 2,000 per square metre in the temperate pastures of New Zealand or in certain irrigated orchards in Australia (8).
In forest areas, ornamental gardens and meadows, soil aeration is mainly provided by earthworms, whose presence can be recognised by the castings they leave on the surface.
Earthworms can ingest up to 20 to 30 times their own weight in soil every day and more than 1,000 tonnes of dry soil per year. It is therefore easy to understand why some farmers and agricultural researchers believe that it is possible to replace ploughing with earthworms, provided that conditions favourable to their optimal development are created, such as those found in forest and grassland soils.
Techniques that prohibit deep tillage aim to preserve the biological characteristics of soils that would be degraded by ploughing, which is partly true when insufficient organic matter is added to compensate for humus losses.
When the soil is ploughed, pathogenic bacteria living deep underground are brought to the surface. Beneficial insects and worms are harmed and eventually become scarce
Ploughing brings more oxygen into the soil, accelerating the decomposition of humus reserves. Certain components of humus are decomposed more quickly. In the presence of oxygen, mineralisation first breaks down the fulvic acids in humus, which disappear after 1 to 3 years.
When the soil is not tilled, the mineralisation of other humus components takes much longer. In temperate regions, and according to some authors, deep tillage, particularly ploughing, results in an annual loss of 1 to 3% of humus, whereas with no-till farming, less than 0.5% of humus is mineralised (9).
Tillage is also criticised for altering the chemical and physical characteristics of the soil, which in particular promotes the deep conservation of weed seeds and alters the colonies of aerobic bacteria that thrive on the soil surface. The seeds of the most resistant weeds, buried by ploughing and protected from their predators (ants, beetles, etc.), will germinate the next time the soil is ploughed after returning to the surface. Aerobic bacteria that thrive on the surface are buried and suffocate.
When it comes to weed management, direct seeding also has its drawbacks. This practice encourages the return of perennial weeds such as creeping bentgrass, whose rhizomes are no longer destroyed. Weed seeds accumulate in the top few centimetres of soil, favouring certain species such as ryegrass and wild oats (brome grass). Their competition for yield can be very strong in winter cereals (10). In conventional farming, there are eight to nine dominant weed species on a plot, whereas in shallow tillage, twenty to fifty species are commonly present (6).
TCSLs are distinguished by the depth and manner in which they work the soil
The pseudo-labour
Soil cultivation with mixing of horizons to a depth equivalent to ploughing (20 to 30 cm), but without turning over the topsoil. The plough, used in Mesopotamia since the 4th millennium BC before becoming widespread in other parts of the world (still used in the Far East, South America and North Africa), is considered a pseudo-ploughing technique.
Nowadays, the principle behind this soil cultivation technique is to mix the original soil with base fertilisers, crop residues and other organic amendments.
In large-scale farming, the tools used are often heavy cultivators or rotary tillers (rotary hoes, motor hoes, etc.). The small rotary hoes used by market gardeners and amateur gardeners are pseudo-tilling tools.
Decompacting the growing medium
Deep working (15 to 30 cm), but with the soil horizons remaining in their original position (no turning of the soil, no mixing of layers).
Certain tools used in field crops, such as the Morris stubble cultivator, are capable of bringing weed roots to the surface.
The broadfork, also known as a biological fork, is a tool used for loosening compacted soil. It is popular with some amateur gardeners and market gardeners who wish to avoid ploughing.
Shallow tillage
This type of soil preparation is similar to pseudo-tilling, but on a shallower depth (5 to 15 cm).
Often used to sow cereal crops after harvesting, for example after harvesting beetroot or potatoes.
In large-scale farming, the most commonly used tools are mouldboard ploughs, disc harrows and tine harrows. For amateur gardeners, a claw (or hook) with a handle is the ideal tool for loosening the topsoil, which can also be done using a rotary tiller by adjusting the position of the depth gauge.
The higher the depth control lever is set, the shallower the rotary tiller works.
Direct seeding
No deep tillage. Tillage is carried out only on the seed row to initiate seed germination. Direct seeding tools are characterised by their seeding elements consisting of discs or tines. While they facilitate seed placement, they have the disadvantage of promoting weed growth.
This technique enables significant savings in fossil fuel consumption; for 3,000 tonnes of soil turned per hectare, 50 litres of fuel are required for ploughing, compared with 6 litres for direct sowing.
To rebuild the biological characteristics of the soil, crop residues must provide at least 30% coverage in addition to plant cover.
Direct sowing must be accompanied by permanent plant cover (alongside export crops or intercrops) to produce green manure on site. After harvesting, the soil must never be left bare, even in winter. Before sowing, the plant cover is destroyed on site, usually with a weedkiller.
The strip-till
This is a variation on direct sowing. The principle is to work the soil corresponding to the row of future seedlings to a depth of 10 to 25 cm, while leaving plant residues on the surface of the unworked areas parallel to the profitable crops.
Direct sowing: technical and economic difficulties that are not easy to overcome
In direct sowing, crop residues are left on the surface where they are gradually broken down by earthworms and other creatures that feed on them. Most of the organic matter in the soil is therefore concentrated in the top few centimetres of soil. However, organic matter is much more exposed to oxidation when it is located close to the surface, where the oxygen concentration is inevitably highest.
Although ploughing can effectively be replaced by earthworms, it takes years to achieve the same result that a plough can achieve in a few hours. Furthermore, earthworm populations are threatened to varying degrees by predators such as moles, birds and wild boars.
The absence of deep ploughing in autumn has an impact on the populations of certain pests that overwinter deep underground, disrupting the cleansing action of winter frosts. The tunnels dug by earthworms are used by pest larvae in autumn to overwinter deep underground, sheltered from winter frosts. The more earthworms there are in the soil, the more shelter pest larvae will find to protect themselves.
The shift from ploughing to direct sowing takes time. According to some authors (11), a transition period of 5 to 10 years is essential for switching to direct sowing. Five years is the time needed for earthworms to turn over the entire topsoil to a depth of about 20 cm. This 5-year transition period is also explained by the relatively slow reproduction cycle of ploughing earthworms. Earthworms (epigeic) that thrive on compost and concentrations of decomposing plant debris on the surface reproduce more quickly. Rebuilding a sufficient population of earthworms requires a large amount of organic matter to feed them, which represents a cost for the farmer (seeds, fertiliser, mowing, shredding, etc
The absence of tillage poses technical and economic challenges that are not easy to resolve :
- Proliferation of slugs due to crop residues left on site.
- The soil takes longer to warm up and dries out more slowly.
- Faster growth of certain weeds such as foxtail, four-angled willowherb, dandelion, rumex (12) and polyphagous predators. An increase in certain weeds such as wood mallow and sea scabious has been observed in southern vineyards, despite the use of glyphosate to try to reduce them.
- Increased risk of disease such as fusarium wilt due to the presence of organic residues on the surface.
- Concentration of herbicide residues and other plant protection products on the surface when these are used.
In intensive agriculture such as that practised in France, ploughing is still the solution preferred by the majority of farmers. However, some French farmers have adopted TCSL to address problems associated with ploughing on certain plots, such as soil erosion and the depletion of humus reserves.
TCSLs also have the advantage of producing significant time savings with reduced fuel costs for direct seeding. Studies show that conservation agriculture practised over 14 years is overall superior to organic farming in terms of soil biomass development (13).
It should be noted that ploughing does not necessarily lead to a reduction in soil microflora as long as the amount of humus present in the soil remains stable and is maintained by the constant addition of plant waste from harvests, farm manure and compost, in addition to plant cover between crops. Plant cover buried by ploughing produces the same benefits as direct sowing without the need for weedkiller.
New studies show that no-till farming is not as sustainable as previously thought.
Data collected over a long period from trials conducted by ARVALIS show that simplified tillage does not always lead to a significant increase in carbon storage compared to ploughing, especially in temperate climates. Over a 40-year observation period, episodes of carbon storage and release were observed for direct seeding and shallow tillage. Ultimately, compared to ploughing and over a long period, there would be no significant difference in carbon storage with reduced tillage (14).
A meta-analysis conducted by the University of Basel and reported on the Agrarheure website in November 2021(15) shows that CO₂ storage, soil protection and increased crop yields cannot be achieved through no-till farming and direct sowing alone. These farming methods are therefore no more sustainable than ploughing with crop residue recycling. This meta-analysis confirms the studies conducted by ARVALIS mentioned above, as well as the studies by soil scientist Axel Don (16) of the Thünen Institute in Braunschweig, who reached very similar conclusions in 2019. Researchers at the Thünen University analysed more than a hundred field studies taking into account the entire soil profile and found that direct seeding methods stored an average of only 150 kg/ha of carbon per year. In many studies, a loss of humus was even observed.
Researchers at the Thünen Institute have noted that direct sowing is only possible in combination with increased use of plant protection products, particularly glyphosate (a). A herbicide is essential to prevent the plant cover from being buried by ploughing (the use of weedkiller facilitates the conversion of plant cover into biomass and prevents weed seeds from germinating). Studies carried out in France show that the development of no-till farming has led to an increase in herbicide consumption ranging from 9% for grain maize to 26% for rapeseed (17).
a) Glyphosate has been classified as “probably carcinogenic to humans” (group 2A) by the IARC, which assesses the hazard of carcinogenicity, while other agencies carry out risk analysis. According to health agencies, glyphosate is safe when used at the recommended doses and under the recommended conditions of use. For more details, visit another page on this website by clicking hGlyphosate: toxicity and exposure risksere
The advantages of different methods of cultivating soil
Although soil cultivation methods are considered aggressive by their detractors because they alter the soil structure using tools, these techniques nevertheless have advantages that are recognised even by those who practise organic farming. Here is a non-exhaustive list of these advantages:
- Ploughing does indeed increase oxygenation of the soil at depth, but this allows beneficial aerobic bacteria to colonise a larger volume of topsoil. These bacteria play an important role in the balance of the soil ecosystem and its fertility. Colonies of rhizobia (nitrogen-fixing bacteria) need oxygen, and ploughing therefore increases their presence in deeper layers of the soil.
- Increased oxygenation through ploughing strengthens the aerobic microbial agents involved in soil health. For example, Pseudomonas spp, a strictly aerobic bacterium that thrives in the rhizosphere, is known to protect plant roots (see the article on the rhizosphere and suppressive soils). It creates an adhesive, protective biofilm called microbial mucilage. This bacterium is also known for its ability to solubilise iron
List of some strictly aerobic microorganisms whose presence, favoured by good oxygenation, stimulates soil health.
Azotobacter et Azospirillum :
fix atmospheric nitrogen to transform it into ammonium (20 to 40 kilograms per hectare).
Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens :
This bacterium produces a phytase enzyme that releases organic phosphorus from the soil. This bacterium colonises roots and slows down harmful fungi. It also generates auxins (growth hormones) that promote root development.
Bacillus Radicola :
Associates with another strict bacterium, Rhizobium, which fixes atmospheric nitrogen in association with host plants such as legumes. Bacillus Radicola produces phytohormones that increase the development of plant root systems.
Lactobacillus Rhamnosus et Lactobacillus Faciminis :
Specialised in the degradation of fresh organic matter containing lignin and cellulose in particular. They also inhibit certain pathogenic germs.
- Manure used directly as fertiliser has the disadvantage of losing some of its nitrogen through the volatilisation of ammonia during its conversion to nitrate. To limit losses through volatilisation, immediate burial is an effective technique, as is the case for slurry.
- Deep ploughing followed by tilling to reduce clods prevents root vegetables such as carrots and chicory from degenerating (forked roots).

Carottes fourchues cultivées dans un sol insuffisamment émietté.
- Potatoes are very demanding in terms of soil preparation, especially as they are fast-growing plants: 90 to 120 days; it is therefore important to encourage root development by mechanically working the soil to a depth of 15 to 20 cm. To obtain well-loosened soil, deep tillage using a chisel plough is particularly desirable in clayey and loamy soils. Due to the specific requirements of potatoes, a thin planting layer of approximately 10 cm must be created, most often achieved in large-scale farming using scarifiers or vibroculteurs.
- The renewal of bacteria on the surface is very rapid. The distribution of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria in the different horizons is corrected very quickly.
- Deep tillage creates numerous pores and microcracks, allowing roots to explore the active zone of the growing medium more easily. Some crops are very demanding in terms of soil structure quality. For example, sunflowers are very sensitive to areas of compaction. Any obstacle to their development can cause them to lose 5 quintals/ha and reduce their oil content (18). Deep tillage is therefore necessary, as it is for certain vegetable crops (melons, leeks, endives, carrots, etc.). It is much easier to achieve deep tillage with mechanical tools than by leaving this work to earthworms, whose action can be hampered by uncontrollable factors, particularly climatic ones.
- Legumes have nodules on their roots that contain bacteria that fix atmospheric nitrogen. These bacteria also consume oxygen to form nitrates, which help enrich the soil with nitrogen. This is why nodules are more numerous in the top few centimetres of soil. Maintaining the soil by working it deeply to facilitate gas exchange with the atmosphere increases the thickness of this zone of biological activity and, at the same time, the soil’s fertility potential.

Nodosités sur des racines de haricots
- Very fine particles suspended in water tend to be carried away by rain and concentrated in layers of varying depths, which in turn causes surface erosion. After a few years, hardened areas form at depth and biological activity decreases. Deep tillage eliminates these hardened areas and repositions the very fine particles in the topsoil. The way in which clay is carried deep underground is described in another article by clicking here.
- In ploughed soil, which is more porous, there is less fertiliser loss due to runoff. Tilling facilitates the flow of irrigation water or rainwater to the roots, which at the same time receive more nutrients carried by the water. Unabsorbed mineral salts are more easily fixed deep in the soil by CAHs, whereas they would be lost through runoff if the soil were not sufficiently tilled.
- Ploughing is very useful for controlling weeds by burying them, which helps to enrich the soil with humus. Ploughing is known to be effective against bird’s knotweed, for example. 90% of brome seeds (locally harmful in winter cereals, known to be favoured by simplified cultivation methods) disappear after ploughing. Ploughing to a sufficient depth alters the establishment of woody weeds (phanerophytes, chamaephytes) and herbaceous species with stumps (hemicryptophytes) such as rumex (19). The effect on annual plants is more or less nuanced, as ploughing brings seeds produced in previous years to the surface if they have withstood climatic and biological disturbances.
- For perennial species, destruction can be partially offset by the germination of rhizome fragments. Success will depend on how these propagules are treated (depth and frequency of ploughing, collection of rhizome residues, etc.) and on climatic conditions. For example, ploughing in dry conditions in summer promotes the drying out of bindweed and creeping thistle rhizomes. After ploughing in summer, a toothed tool can be used to remove the dried rhizomes. Mechanised ploughing has made it possible to relegate once-common rhizome weeds, such as creeping bentgrass, to the edges of fields.
- Ploughing is an effective tool for disrupting the life cycle of pathogenic microorganisms such as fusarium, a devastating disease that affects soft wheat and certain vegetable crops (provided that the residues are finely shredded before being buried and that crop rotations are implemented to avoid incompatible combinations). No-till crops are more vulnerable if potentially contaminated residues are left on the surface and no treatment has been carried out before harvest to combat fusarium.
- Autumn ploughing facilitates the destruction of the eggs and pupae of harmful insects that have burrowed into the soil to protect themselves from the winter cold, exposing them to birds or frost. Some pests, such as wireworms, burrow deep into the soil to withstand the cold. Another example: the larvae of the celery fly (Philophylla heraclei) overwinter in the soil at a depth of 5 to 10 cm
- Shallow ploughing of a plot allows winter frost to destroy celery fly larvae without the use of pesticides. However, some beneficial ground beetles that overwinter in the soil as larvae or adults are also destroyed, but their population can be largely maintained by preserving semi-natural habitats near crops.
- It should be noted that shredding plant matter left on the surface, as suggested by some proponents of direct seeding, is not sufficient to eliminate pests, as the soil is not turned over to bring the pests or their eggs to the surface
While it is true that mechanisation in large-scale farming has led to deeper ploughing exceeding 30 cm, in recent years there has been a return to shallower ploughing in order to reduce organic matter losses. To this end, manufacturers offer stubble ploughs with low traction power that work the soil to a depth of 10 to 15 cm. Some stubble ploughs with ploughshares also allow mechanical weeding to be carried out while respecting the deep structure of the soil

Cross-section of the soil in the author’s garden at Oraison showing the thickness of the topsoil maintained by ploughing and certain soil conservation techniques (pseudo-tillage and shallow tillage)
When it comes to maintaining cultivated soil, there is no single ideal technique that supersedes all others; only techniques that are suited to the soil and climate conditions of the location.
For amateur gardeners, soil cultivation alternating between ploughing, pseudo-ploughing and shallow cultivation is still the most practical method of soil maintenance, provided that a minimum amount of compost is spread each year to compensate for humus losses.
Deep soil cultivation carried out correctly with periodic additions of medium and long-term composts ultimately produces topsoil corresponding to the thickness of the cultivated soil. This layer of topsoil improves every year, and it is easy to ensure that this is the case.
If we remove the topsoil layer, we can see a colour difference between the worked soil and the lighter underlying layer. The photo above shows a hole about 40 cm deep dug in my vegetable garden, revealing the topsoil layer about 30 cm deep and the lighter underlying layer. Fifteen years ago, the original soil was even lighter in colour, as the underlying layer had since received organic matter from the topsoil through infiltration
1) L’économie rurale et la vie dans les campagnes dans l’occident médiéval, Georges Duby
2) Mœurs et usages du Lauragais ; 1868 ; Marseille : Laffitte Reprints, 1979.
3) AGDAILY February 16, 2021 Over a third of U.S. Corn Belt has lost its carbon-rich topsoil ♦
4) Salambier et al., 2014
5) erre-net 5-12-2013 Il atteint 4 % des surfaces cultivées en blé tendre ♦
6) Pionnier en agriculture de conservation des sols : le goût d’innover ; INRA – science & impact 22-01-2019
7) AGDAILY December 03, 2020 Cover Crop Corner: What cover crops have gifted us ♦
8) Global Soil Biodiversity Atlas p 58
9) Fertilité des sols, importance de la matière organique – chambre d’agriculture Bas Rhin
10) Infloweb ; connaître et gérer la flore adventice
11) La fertilité des sols : l’importance de la matière organique – agriculture & terroirs, chambre d’agriculture du Bas-Rhin – dec 2011
12) Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Fried et al., 2012 Trajectories of weed communities explained by traits associated with species’ response to management practices ♦
13) agronomy for sustainable Development – janvier 2015, vol 35 Fourteen years of evidence for positive effects of conservation agriculture and organic farming on soil life ♦
15) agrarheute 12-11-2021 ; Pfluglos ackern: Bringt doch nichts? – Neue Fakten ♦
16) Agrarheute 11-10-2019 Humus im Boden: Pfluglos arbeiten bringt nichts ♦
17) Enquête SSP 2017
18) Le tournesol ; chambre d’agriculture Landes 2014 p 19
19) L’appauvrissement floristique des champs cultivés – Philippe Jauzein ; dossier de l’environnement INRA N° 21 ♦
